Legal Opinion

Curzi v. Curzi

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 6, 1990No. 7663PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to modify the orders of alimony and child support entered in the judgment for the dissolution of his marriage. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in failing to find a significant change in circumstances justifying a modification of the alimony and support orders, and (2) in finding that the maintenance orders contemplated full-time employment for the plaintiff and, therefore, precluded modification. We find no error.

On July 25,1988, the trial court rendered judgment dissolving the parties’ eight year marriage.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Albrecht v. AlbrechtConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Roach v. RoachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Cattaneo v. CattaneoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Savage v. SavageConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Lord v. LordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Richard v. RichardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Brennan v. Brennan, No. Fa 96 72455 (Sep. 8, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
  5. Curzi v. CurziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API