Legal Opinion

Richard v. Richard

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 28, 1990No. 8588PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for modification of alimony and child support. The dispositive issue1 is whether the trial court should have considered the defendant’s evidence that his job change was involuntary before it concluded that the defendant had failed to show a substantial change in his circumstances because that change was voluntary. We conclude that the court should have considered this evidence.

*59The parties’ nine year marriage was dissolved on March 25,1988. At the dissolution hearing, the plaintiff testified that the parties had reached an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Sanchione v. SanchioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Simpson v. DaileySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  5. O'Bymachow v. O'BymachowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FisherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Schade v. SchadeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Salaman v. SalamanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Moffitt v. Moffit, No. Fa96 &8212 0109909 (May 27, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  5. Cabrera v. CabreraConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API