Legal Opinion

Still v. Hopkins (In re Hopkins)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided May 17, 2013No. Bankruptcy No. 10-13385; Adversary No. 12-1051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*308MEMORANDUM

SHELLEY D. RUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Trustee has filed this adversary proceeding against the defendants James F. Hopkins, Marilyn Hopkins-Dixon, Vivian Hopkins-Bailey, and Anthony Hopkins. [Doc. No. 1, Complaint].1 One of the four named defendants, Marilyn Hopkins-Dixon (“Hopkins-Dixon” or “Defendant”), has moved to dismiss this adversary proceeding on the grounds: (1) that the court lacks jurisdiction over the state law fraudulent conveyance claim against non-creditors; (2) that the adversary complaint fails to name her mother, the debtor, Bettie Jean Hopkins (“Debtor”), who is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re SilvermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
  2. In re SassoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  3. Farinash v. HardinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2021
  4. In re: BRADLEY EDWARD KOEBERER and NANCY LOUISE KOEBERERUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. The Strauss Company, Inc. v. Jarrett Builders, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API