Legal Opinion

Kingsley v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 16, 1965No. 233-59PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam: This case was referred pursuant to former Eule 45(a), now 57(a), to Trial Commissioner Paul H. Mc-Murray with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for a conclusion of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed July 22, 1964. The plaintiff has excepted to the opinion and certain of the findings of fact. The parties have filed briefs and the case has been orally argued. Since the court agrees with the commissioner’s findings, his opinion, and his recommended conclusion of law, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby adopts the same as the basis…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Furlong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. Girault v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  4. Towell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. MacFarlane v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Francis G. Brown v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. James A. Beckham v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Pope v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Ace Construction Company, a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API