Legal Opinion
People v. Wilson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 5, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
In light of the suppression court’s determination that the Transit Authority police had reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant but lacked probable cause to detain him, we are required to decide whether subsequently secured identifications and statements must be suppressed as “fruits of the poisonous tree”. (United States v Crews, 445 US 463; Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471.) We conclude that the “exploitation of the illegality” was sufficiently attenuated by the intervening time and investigation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. AllahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. ZimmermanNew York Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.