Legal Opinion

People v. Allah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 23, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although the hearing court found that the defendant’s arrest was not based on probable cause and was, therefore, illegal, such a conclusion does not automatically result in suppression of any evidence obtained subsequent to the arrest. Suppression does not lie where the means used to obtain the evidence are " 'sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint’ ” (Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 488).

In this case, the defendant was identified by the complainant as her assailant from a photo array and a corporeal lineup, both conducted subsequent to his illegal arrest. While…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. McCloudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API