People v. Allah
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Although the hearing court found that the defendant’s arrest was not based on probable cause and was, therefore, illegal, such a conclusion does not automatically result in suppression of any evidence obtained subsequent to the arrest. Suppression does not lie where the means used to obtain the evidence are " 'sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint’ ” (Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 488).
In this case, the defendant was identified by the complainant as her assailant from a photo array and a corporeal lineup, both conducted subsequent to his illegal arrest. While…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. McCloudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.