Legal Opinion

In Re Gregory

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1927No. Docket No. 1427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Petition for habeas corpus. It appears therefrom that petitioner was charged with the crime of forgery. The complaint was filed in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco. The matter came on regularly for hearing, petitioner being represented by counsel. He waived a preliminary examination and the judge of said court, sitting as a committing magistrate, held him to answer. It is claimed that the commitment is void for the reason that a preliminary examination is made mandatory by constitutional provision, and the privilege cannot be waived by an accused. The constitutional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kalloch v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. People v. BomarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. MccurdyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ex parte WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. People v. ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API