Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Scandrett
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 20, 1941No. Nos. 7529-7537PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
The order before us was entered in a proceeding for the reorganization of the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railway Co., Debtor, which was in court pursuant to the authorization of Sec. 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 205. It made allowances for fees to various attorneys and firms of attorneys who had appeared and rendered legal services of value in the reorganization.
Appellants are a firm of attorneys who participated in said proceedings, representing certain bondholders. They were allowed nothing for their services. Feeling aggrieved they have appealed and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warren v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Adair v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Warren v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Abrams v. ScandrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.