Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Bankers Trust Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 8, 1943No. Nos. 387, 388PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
This controversy arises in a proceeding under § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act1 for the reorganization of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company system, part of which is the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway, under a mortgage of whose property the respondent Bank*165ers Trust Company is trustee. The respondent obtained leave to intervene in the District Court and before the Interstate Commerce Commission,2 and participated in the proceedings.
The Commission approved a plan of reorganization, and the District Court, with the plan before it, directed the filing of all petitions for allowance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abrams v. ScandrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- In Re Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940
- In Re Chicago, G. W. R.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939
- In re New York, N. H. & H. R.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1942
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Brown v. GerdesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.