Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Scandrett

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 4, 1943No. 8366PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Here, as they did in Abrams v. Scandrett et al., 7 Cir., 121 F.2d 371, appellants complain that the District Court improperly overruled their objections to the finding and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, made in connection with a plan of reorganization, denying them fees or expenses from the debtor estate. The nature of the services rendered, the pertinent surrounding circumstances and the legal issues involved are set forth in our earlier opinion and need no repetition.

We concluded then that the District Court was “powerless to allow appellants any sum.”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. In Re Porto Rican American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. In Re New York InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  5. Realty Associates Securities Corp. v. Newman & BiscoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Brady v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kentucky Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  4. Illinois v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
  5. In re Barry Yao Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API