Legal Opinion
Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. Quaker Oil Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 20, 1972No. 8616PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAjlmond, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, reported in full at 161 USPQ 547 (1969), sustaining a notice *765of opposition against an application1 to register the mark “SUPER BLEND” on the Principal Register for motor oil under section 2(f) of the Act of 1946, (15 USC 1052(f)). Applicant, Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation, hereinafter appellant, asserted use since September 16,1954 and ownership of Registration No. 623,7122 and Registration No. 664,961.3 Appellant sought to establish that the designation SUPER BLEND had become distinctive as a result of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- David B. Dale v. Henry P. Rosenfeld, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Henry P. Rosenfeld Co., Samson Wallach and Abraham S. GechtmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Roselux Chemical Co., Inc., Bonnie-Lan, Inc., and Proxite Products, Inc. v. Parsons Ammonia Company, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- McCormick & Company, Inc. v. Marion K. SummersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by28 opinions
- Yamaha International Corporation v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., Assignee of Hoshino Gakki Ten Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Tone Brothers, Inc. v. Sysco Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- BigStar Entertainment, Inc. v. Next Big Star, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In re Clorox Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Bbk Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.