Legal Opinion

Roselux Chemical Co., Inc., Bonnie-Lan, Inc., and Proxite Products, Inc. v. Parsons Ammonia Company, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6715PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

Registration of “sudsy” is opposed. Opposers are appealing from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (124 USPQ 524) dismissing three consolidated oppositions, Nos. 37,969, 37,975, and 37,976, all opposing the issuance of a Principal Register registration on appellee’s application Ser. No. 38,558, filed October 8, 1957, of “sudsy” as a trademark for “aqueous ammonium hydroxide composition,” as the goods are described in the application. Comprehension of the issues in this case requires a more accurate understanding of what the goods are. To that end we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Application of Deister Concentrator Company, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Dewalt, Inc. v. Magna Power Tool Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Miller Brewing Company v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Yamaha International Corporation v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., Assignee of Hoshino Gakki Ten Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. The Vision Center, Cross v. Opticks, Inc., Will Ross, Inc. And G. D. Searle & Co., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API