Murray v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is extortion; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.
It was alleged in the indictment that appellants “were then and there duly qualified and acting deputy constables of Precinct No. 2 of Harris County, Texas.” Appellants insist that a deputy constable is not an officer within the contemplation of article 365, Penal Code, 1925. We quote the article: “If any officer or person authorized by law to demand or receive fees of office, shall willfully collect for himself or for another any fee or fees not allowed by law, or any money as a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wilson and Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
3Cited by16 opinions
- Irwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Rich and Hahn v. Graybar Elec. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Day v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Miller v. City of Alamo HeightsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.