Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Alamo Heights

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 7, 1955No. 12850PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

William Addison Miller, Jr., has appealed from a summary judgment which refused to reinstate him to the office of deputy city marshal of the City of Alamo Heights and to award him his back salary. He claimed that he was suspended without a hearing as required by law. He was denied all relief after a summary judgment proceeding.

Without an office there can be no officer. On that principle, the trial court correctly held that appellant’s claim should be denied, since the office which he claimed did not exist. Both parties recognize that a deputy city marshal is an officer. The City…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Noel v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Rich and Hahn v. Graybar Elec. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Dallas v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. City of Paris v. CabinessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Brumby v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1980
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1982
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1980
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API