Legal Opinion

Irwin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1944No. 22568PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The offense for which appellant stands convicted is that of operating a policy game (Art. 619, P. C.) ; the punishment, confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.

The mode, manner and method by which the policy game was operated is, in all material aspects, similar to that shown in Cagle v. State, No. 22,490, this day decided, wherein the facts were held sufficient to support a conviction. No reason is perceived to state the facts here.

The pivotal question presented for determination relates to introduction of evidence obtained as a result of the search of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. W.D. Yett, Mayor v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Battle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Odenthal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hill v. PirtleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Angel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Love v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API