Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1978No. 50356PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

The sole issue on appeal concerns correctness of the trial court’s action in sustaining appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Appellee’s motion was predicated upon the asserted lack of any controversy as to a material fact which would demonstrate grounds for setting aside a previously executed release and satisfaction of appellant’s claim.

Appellant, hereafter plaintiff, sued defendant railroad under Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C., sec. 51, as amended, to recover damages for personal injuries. The petition alleged injury to plaintiff’s left wrist on February 3,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Davis v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. French v. Sotheby & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Birch v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sabine Corp. v. ONG Western, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Fischer v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Fisher v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Fisher v. Owens-Corning FiberboardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API