Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 18, 1989No. CIV-87-2032-A, 88-932-APublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in this matter is ARCO’s motion for summary judgment. The parties have submitted and the Court has reviewed over 100 pages of briefs on this motion, and many more pages of exhibits. This order will dispose of the issues in the order they are raised in ARCO’s motion and initial brief.(1) Effect of Releases Given by Cummings and Lloyd Fischer
ARCO relies on a release from liability for past and future damages contained in a 1963 surface lease for ARCO’s South Injection Station. ARCO further relies on some 42 additional releases executed by Cummings or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Corbett v. Combined Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Miller v. Cudahy Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- Tenneco Oil Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alexander v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Tosco Corp. v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Elsken v. Network Multi-Family Security Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Branch v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.