Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1989No. 87-1801PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The motion was granted on the grounds that a release signed by the plaintiff barred the plaintiff’s claim. The district court, applying Oklahoma law, rejected plaintiff’s argument that the release should be set aside due to a mutual mistake of fact. We affirm.

As an initial matter, plaintiff-appellant argues that it was improper for the district court to dismiss the claim under Rule 12(b)(6) Fed.R.Civ.P. Although the motion for dismissal was brought under Rule 12(b)(6), it is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Combined Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. CauthenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Prospero Associates, a Colorado General Partnership v. Burroughs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. Tulsa City Lines, Inc. v. MainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Davis v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Owens-Corning FiberboardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Rebecca Woody v. A.W. Chesterton CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API