Legal Opinion

Gray Ex Rel. Gray v. Midland Risk Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1996No. 83320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Justice.

The issue in this case concerns the amount of uninsured motorist coverage applicable when the insured vehicle was operated by a non-designated driver under the terms of the policy. The policy provided for $50,000.00 liability coverage and $50,000 uninsured motorist coverage when the vehicle was being operated by a designated driver. When operated by a non-designated driver, the liability coverage was reduced, under the terms of the policy, to the statutory minimum, $10,-000. Title 36 O.S.1991 § 3636 provides that uninsured motorist coverage shall not exceed the amount of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Shepard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Lake v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. May v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Withrow v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burch v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Krause v. KrauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Argonaut Insurance v. EarnestDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012
  4. Burch v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Burch v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API