Shoemaker v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
In this action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, after verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant [appellant and cross-respondent herein], the plaintiffs [respondents and cross-appellants herein], moved for a new trial; their motion was granted upon the ground, among others, that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; and the defendant appeals, contending that the evidence establishes the defense of contributory negligence as a matter of law. This contention raises the determinative issue on appeal.
In compliance with the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dahlquist v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Schultz v. MathiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cowan v. BunceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Whinery v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hixson v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963