Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1962No. Civ. 6730PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, after verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant [appellant and cross-respondent herein], the plaintiffs [respondents and cross-appellants herein], moved for a new trial; their motion was granted upon the ground, among others, that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; and the defendant appeals, contending that the evidence establishes the defense of contributory negligence as a matter of law. This contention raises the determinative issue on appeal.

In compliance with the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dahlquist v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Schultz v. MathiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Cowan v. BunceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Whinery v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Hixson v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API