Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 22, 2011No. SC08-1871PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPariente, J.

When will a drug-detection dog’s alert to the exterior of a vehicle provide an officer with probable cause to conduct a warrant-less search of the interior of the vehicle? That is the question in this case, and the answer is integral to the constitutional right of all individuals in this state to be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures.1

The issue of when a dog’s alert provides probable cause for a search hinges on the dog’s reliability as a detector of illegal substances within the vehicle. We hold that the State may establish probable cause by demonstrating that the officer had…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. ForesteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. People v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API