Legal Opinion

Douglass v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Jackson District Court. Action brought by Douglass, as guardian of the estate of Hattie R. Douglass, against Dickson, to recover damages for rock quarried and carried away from a certain tract of land claimed to belong to plaintiff. Trial by a jury at the January Term, 1884, but at the close of the evidence the court instructed the jury to find for the defendant. Judgment for costs against the plaintiff, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action brought by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, to recover of defendant in error for certain rock quarried and carried away from a tract of land claimed to belong to the plaintiff. The defendant, not questioning the fact of the quarrying and removing of the rock, claimed the right to do so as owner. The case was tried by a jury, but at the close of the testimony the court instructed the jury to find for the defendant. The plaintiff’s title is founded upon a tax deed issued to John,C. Douglass on January 30, 1872, based…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stebbins v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868
  2. Lightner v. MooneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
  3. Morrill v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. BaumannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Chicago Lumber Co. v. FretzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Hall v. Pioneer Crop Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. KurentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Kunkel v. Utah Lumber Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API