Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Baumann
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 10, 1941PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This is an original action in mandamus brought by the City of St. Louis against its collector of revenue to compel him to make a deed conveying to the City certain land bought at a tax sale held under the provisions of the Jones-Munger Act of 1933. [Sec. 11117, R. S. 1939 et seq., Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 9945, p. 7988.] This act was applicable to the City only for a short period because in 1939 it was amended so as to take the city and counties of a certain population out of its provisions. [Sec. 11183, R. S. 1939, see. 9952a-1, p. 7995 et seq.] But this controversy arose while the law was yet…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Witherspoon v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Laret Investment Co. v. DickmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State v. LockeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Hamilton v. LinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Home Building Corp. v. Ventura Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Costello v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Reinhold v. Fee Fee Trunk Sewer, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.