Legal Opinion

Systematic Tool & MacHine Co. v. Walter Kidde & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1976No. Civ. A. 70-1708PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FOGEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action seek an injunction and damages from defendant for infringement of United States Letters Patent 3,369,582 (the ’582 patent), granted to plaintiff Clayton Giangiulio on February 20, 1968, for a “Tomato Sheer”. Defendant marketed two machines which allegedly infringed the patent. Plaintiffs, as the holders of the patent developed and sold a machine based on their invention. In a prior Opinion and Order dated February 21, 1975, we upheld the validity of the patent and also found that defendants had infringed it. Because the case was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. New Hampshire Bankers Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Trio Process Corporation, in No. 71-1295 v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc., in No. 71-1296Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Robertson ClassDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API