Wall v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIAN, Judge.
The offense is assault with intent to murder; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for four years.
The recognizance recites that appellant “stands charged with the offense of assault with intent to murder,” but fails to show that appellant has been convicted. It is necessary that the recognizance, or appeal bond show that appellant has been convicted. Article 817 C. C. P.; Wilmering v. State, 272 S. W. 463. Appellant being enlarged under a defective recognizance, this court is without jurisdiction. Rhea v. State, 275 S. W. 1021.
The appeal is dismissed.
Dismissed.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jupe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Wilmering v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Rhea v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hagler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Hendricks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Hearne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.