Rhea v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The offense is seduction; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
Attention is directed to the failure of the recognizance to conform with the essentials named in the statute, in that it does not state the offense of which the appellant was convicted. When one is released on bail, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon his case in the absence of a recognizance prepared in conformity with the law. See Art. 903, C. C. P; Vernon's Tex.Crim. Stat., p. 873; Watson v. State,62 Tex. Crim. 620; Willoughby v. State, 87 Tex. Crim. 40; Godby v. State, 227…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willoughby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Godby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Nugent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Hendricks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.