Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1944No. 22740Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for receiving stolen property, knowing it to have been so stolen; punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Apparently appellant has been released pending appeal upon a purported appeal bond which is fatally defective. In the first place, it fails to recite that appellant had been convicted of a felony as is required by the provisions of Articles 817 and 818, C. C. P., but recites only that appellant stood charged with a felony. In form the bond is for appearance for trial rather than pending appeal and is insufficient. Doddy v. State, 91 Tex.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Doddy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Golle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API