Legal Opinion

Peeples v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1990No. 1848 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Polly Peeples (Petitioner), widow of James B. Peeples, appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s determination that Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (Employer) is entitled to a subrogation interest in a third party claim awarded to the Petitioner. The Board, while affirming the decision, modified the calculation of the credited number of weeks grace period found by the referee. We affirm the order of the Board including the modification.

It is undisputed that Mr. Peeples died on August 19, 1980 from mesothelioma, a rare form of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Winfree v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Kelly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Royal Factories, Inc. v. GarciaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mrkich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Ward v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. A. Griffis v. WCAB (Albert Einstein Healthcare Network)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API