State ex rel. Seigler v. Rone
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Equal protection dictates that the state must provide indigent criminal defendants “* # * with a transcript of prior proceedings when that transcript is needed for an effective defense or appeal.” Britt v. North *362Carolina (1971), 404 U. S. 226, 227. See, also, Mayer v. Chicago (1971), 404 U. S. 189; Draper v. Washington (1963), 372 U. S. 487; Griffin v. Illinois (1956), 351 U. S. 12; State v. Arrington (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 114, 326 N. E. 2d 667. Appellant disputes both the indigency of appellee and his need for a complete transcript of testimony.
Appellant asserts in his Proposition of Law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ArringtonOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by16 opinions
- State ex rel. Spirko v. Judges of the Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Greeen v. EnrightOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. Charles W. JonasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State ex rel. Copeland v. Judges of the CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.