State ex rel. Greeen v. Enright
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Greene alleges that he was effectively denied his constitutional right of appeal, pro se, since, without access to the transcript, he was not able to prepare his brief. The court of appeals held otherwise. We concur and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
The fundamental constitutional right of access to the courts requires that prisoners have a meaningful opportunity to present claims to the courts. Bounds v. Smith (1977), 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72. Therefore, when a state grants persons convicted a direct appeal as of right, equal protection and due process of law…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Grove v. NadelOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Iacovone v. KaminskiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Drexel Greene v. Anthony J. Brigano, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.