Legal Opinion
State v. Arrington
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1975No. 74-332PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.
The primary question presented in this appeal is whether the denial of defendant’s motion' for the transcript of the preliminary hearing was prejudicial error. This court finds that the motion should have been granted, and accordingly reverses the decision of the Court of Appeals.
*1161.
The new Ohio Rules of Criminal Procedure are inapplicable to this appeal since the proceedings before the trial court were completed prior to the effective date of those rules, July 1, 1973.
The record does not contain an affidavit of indigency or entry declaring the defendant to be an indigent prior to the motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. WoodardsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. KuligOhio Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Spirko v. Judges of the Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BentzOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.