Ramcharan-Maharajh v. Gilliland
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Leben, J.:
More tiran 4 years after Osage City had authorized contracts to participate in a federal rails-to-trails project, Bisses-samath Ramcharan-Maharajh submitted petitions seeking to put the project before the voters for approval—or disapproval—in a referendum. But referendums are available in Kansas only when specifically authorized by statute, and no statute authorized the referendum Ramcharan sought. The district court therefore properly dismissed Ramcharan’s lawsuit, which sought to force county officials to put the referendum on the ballot.
Factual Background ,
In 2004, the Osage City…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kendall v. BalcerzakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Molinari v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Topeka v. ImmingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
- Pretty Prairie Wind v. Reno CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022