Legal Opinion

Ramcharan-Maharajh v. Gilliland

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 7, 2012No. 106,906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

More tiran 4 years after Osage City had authorized contracts to participate in a federal rails-to-trails project, Bisses-samath Ramcharan-Maharajh submitted petitions seeking to put the project before the voters for approval—or disapproval—in a referendum. But referendums are available in Kansas only when specifically authorized by statute, and no statute authorized the referendum Ramcharan sought. The district court therefore properly dismissed Ramcharan’s lawsuit, which sought to force county officials to put the referendum on the ballot.

Factual Background ,

In 2004, the Osage City…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kendall v. BalcerzakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 349, State Question No. 642Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Molinari v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Topeka v. ImmingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  2. Pretty Prairie Wind v. Reno CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API