Legal Opinion
Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. Knight
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 21, 1984No. 82-898PublishedCited by 479 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
The State of Minnesota authorizes its public employees to bargain collectively over terms and conditions of employment. It also requires public employers to engage in official exchanges of views with their professional employees on policy questions relating to employment but outside the scope of mandatory bargaining. If professional employees forming an appropriate bargaining unit have selected an exclusive representative for mandatory bargaining, their employer may exchange views on nonmandatory subjects only with the exclusive representative. The question presented in these cases is whether…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by479 opinions
- EJS Properties, LLC v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- San Filippo v. BongiovanniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Polyns Bieregu v. Janet Reno L. Yearby G. Berman, All Employees of Mail Room StaffsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- William B. Shipley v. Chicago Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Urofsky v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
474 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.