Legal Opinion

Martin v. King Riding Device Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1968No. Docket No. 3,244PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiff James L. Martin was a passenger in an amusement park ride known as the “Comet” operated by the defendant King Riding *482Device Co., Inc. Comet passengers rode in open gondolas. Each gondola was suspended by 4 cables, 2 at the front and 2 at the rear of the gondola, from a steel arm emanating from a center pole which when activated spun the gondolas in a wide are a number of feet above the ground.

"While the plaintiff was thus being spun around, one of the cables attached to his gondola broke, and moments later 2 others snapped, leaving the gondola attached by one cable as it continued…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gadde v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lipsitz v. SchechterMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Golden v. MannexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Gromowsky v. IngersolMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conerly v. LiptzenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API