Martin v. King Riding Device Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
Plaintiff James L. Martin was a passenger in an amusement park ride known as the “Comet” operated by the defendant King Riding *482Device Co., Inc. Comet passengers rode in open gondolas. Each gondola was suspended by 4 cables, 2 at the front and 2 at the rear of the gondola, from a steel arm emanating from a center pole which when activated spun the gondolas in a wide are a number of feet above the ground.
"While the plaintiff was thus being spun around, one of the cables attached to his gondola broke, and moments later 2 others snapped, leaving the gondola attached by one cable as it continued…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Gadde v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Lipsitz v. SchechterMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Golden v. MannexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Gromowsky v. IngersolMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conerly v. LiptzenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972