Legal Opinion
Dimmock v. Allstate Insurance
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 3, 2004No. AC 24064PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The plaintiff, Gail Dimmock, appeals from the revised judgment of the trial court, rendered after the court granted the motion filed by the defendant Allstate Insurance Company to open the judgment and *238for remittitur.1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) opened the judgment and ordered a remittitur on the basis of her underinsured motorist policy limits, and (2) ordered a setoff of the amount paid to her by the underinsured tortfeasor. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the issues on appeal. On November 26, 1998, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Florestal v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Doyle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Tiber Holding Corp. v. GreenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Connecticut Savings Bank v. ObenaufConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stiffler v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Fuchs v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Dimmock v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Dimmock v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Loch View, LLC v. WindhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022