Legal Opinion

Fuchs v. Allstate Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 27, 2006No. AC 26298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The plaintiff, Deborah Fuchs, appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, following the trial court’s granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this action seeking the recovery of underinsured motorist benefits. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendant because (1) genuine issues of material fact exist and (2) the defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

A review of the record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. Allstate Insurance v. LendaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Frantz v. RomaineConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Dimmock v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. MuroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stott v. Peerless InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. White v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API