Legal Opinion
Wilson, McCall & Daoro v. American Qualified Plans, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 19, 1999No. A078295PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANING, J.
J.Wilson, McCall & Daoro, a certified public accounting partnership, and Robert R. Daoro (hereafter collectively Wilson) appeal a summary judgment in favor of American Qualified Plans, Inc. (AQP), in Wilson’s cross-action for indemnity. AQP appeals a summary judgment in favor of Wilson in AQP’s cross-action for indemnity, contending the court erred in determining AQP was not entitled to attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 1021.6. AQP also appeals a subsequent order denying its motion for attorney fees under section 1038.
Background
In February 1994 Ben A.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Davis v. Air Technical Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Asamen v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Fidelity Mortgage Trustee Service, Inc. v. Ridgegate East Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westamerica Bank v. Mbg Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Unocal Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Unocal Corporation v. The United States Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000