Legal Opinion

FLAGSTAFF MEDICAL CENTER, INC. v. Sebelius

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided August 30, 2010No. CV-09-8069-PCT-PGRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Flagstaff Medical Center’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 17) and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22). Having considered the parties’ memoranda in light of the administrative record, the Court finds that both motions should be granted in part and denied in part. 1

Background

This action, which arises under the Medicare Act, Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et seq., involves a dispute between plaintiff Flagstaff Medical Center, a non-profit acute care hospital that is a provider of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API