Legal Opinion

Seay v. City of Knoxville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 8, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

654 S.W.2d 397 (1983)

Roy L. SEAY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CITY OF KNOXVILLE, et al., Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section.

March 8, 1983.

Permission to Appeal Denied May 31, 1983.

Joseph B. Yancey and Bruce A. Anderson, Knoxville, for defendant-appellant.

Daniel J. Goodman and David W. McNabb, Knoxville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court May 31, 1983.

OPINION

SANDERS, Judge.

The threshold question on this appeal is whether the court committed error in granting a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence when there was no showing…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Monday v. MillsapsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  2. Johnson v. Woman's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. Memphis Street Railway Company v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Moore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Seay v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API