Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of McClatchey
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided March 6, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
When the account originally filed by the administratrix was under scrutiny certain objectants sought direction from the court that the operations of a corporation wholly ■ owned by deceased be disclosed. An account of- the doings of that • corporation was in due course ordered and in addition the further ■transactions of the administratrix as such were brought down to ■ date. As a result the court now has before it the original account, ■•the supplementary schedules of that account and the schedules of -the operations of the wholly owned corporation.
*697A separate proceeding was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- W. H. H. Chamberlin, Inc. v. AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Atlas Television Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- New York Steam Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- City of Rochester v. . BlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In re the Estate of PhillipsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Estate of HenkeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re the Estate of BegentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- City of New York v. LeibowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- In re E. & H. Goldstein Family TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Accounting of SolomonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.