Legal Opinion
W. H. H. Chamberlin, Inc. v. Andrews
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crane, Ch. J.
The complaint in each of the actions herein asks for a declaratory judgment that the New York unemployment insurance law (Laws of 1935, ch. 468; Labor Law, art. 18; Cons. Laws, ch. 31) is unconstitutional under both the Federal and the State Constitutions.
The plaintiffs moved for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the court in the first two cases granted the motions to the extent of holding that subdivision 2 of section 504 of the statute violates section 6 of article I of the New York Constitution, and section 1 of the Fourteenth…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Southern Railway Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- In re the Claim of GruberNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Beeland Wholesale Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.