Legal Opinion
In re E. & H. Goldstein Family Trust
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 8, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding to judicially settle the final account of a trust, Norman Goldstein appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Riordan, S.), dated October 27, 2009, which, inter alia, awarded the petitioner an attorney’s fee for services rendered in connection with the petitioner’s account.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, payable by Norman Goldstein personally.
The petitioner, Kenneth J. Goldstein, commenced this proceeding in July 2008 to judicially settle his account as a cotrustee of the E. & H. Goldstein…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kondratyeva v. YapiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Estate of CurtisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Estate of McClatcheyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- State v. MappaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Estate of KananackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Jalaya A.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Jalaya A.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re SkolnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re SkolnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Wasserstein v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017