Erickson v. McCullough
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
The complaint alleges that John Marvin Erickson is a minor, N. H. Tanner is his guardian ad litem for the purpose of bringing the action against the defendants. McCullough & Callister are attorneys. Gwendolyn Erickson is the mother of the plaintiff minor. She was not served with summons, and did not appear.
In May, 1933, the plaintiff, minor, was injured through charged negligence on the part of the Arctic Ice Company. McCullough & Callister, attorneys, were employed by the mother, who was appointed guardian ad litem, and a suit was brought. In December, 1933, a compromise…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Estate & Guardianship of EikerenkotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re the Guardianship of the Persons & Estates of MorehouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re LundbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Asher v. YorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re Chin Mee HoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Adoption of PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Gale v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Estate of LatsisUtah Supreme Court · 1955