Asher v. Yorba
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an interlocutory decree of the Superior Court of Orange County. J. W. Ballard, Judge. The facts- are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This appeal is by Mary A. Flinn from an interlocutory decree in partition. She claims as the successor in interest of Felipe Ames. To support her claim she insists: 1. That a certain sale of real estate by the guardian of Felipe Ames, minor, was void; and, 2. That a decree of distribution rendered in the administration of the estate of the mother of Felipe Ames was also void.
It is insisted that the guardian of Felipe Ames was appointed without any notice as required by statute, and therefore his appointment was void, and his acts in making the sale were also void for that reason. The statute…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. BiscailuzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Gronfier v. PuymirolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Burroughs v. De CoutsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Powers v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In Re LundbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ross v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Harness v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Crabtree v. BathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.