Legal Opinion

Huff v. United States Department of Army

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 13, 2007No. Civil L-05-805PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LEGG, Chief Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff James E. Huff (“Huff’ or “Plaintiff’) initiated this action in April 2005 against the United States Department of the Army (“the Army”), requesting back pay, disability and hospital benefits, and correction of his military records. Now before the Court is the Army’s Motion to Dismiss. Because the briefs adequately present the issues, no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md. 2004). For the reasons stated herein, the Army’s motion is GRANTED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & ExplosivesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  2. Nieves v. McHughDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. Hoffler v. HagelDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  4. Lanier-Finn v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  5. Andes v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API