Legal Opinion
Smith v. Morris
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 21, 1934No. 5263PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
A bill was filed in the District Court of the United Slates for the District of Delaware against Peoples’ Light and Power Corporation, praying for the appointment of a receiver. Later, Albert L. Register and others, being interested in Class A stock of the respondent corporation, moved through their attorney, Sidney E. Smith, of Philadelphia, for leave to intervene. The motion was granted. Although ordinarily the judge in the District of Delaware appoints receivers of his own selection without nomination by parties or their attorneys, in this instance, on request by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Chase v. DriverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Albright v. OysterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- United Engineering & Foundry Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
- Spencer v. Babylon R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Luther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- In Re Greenpoint Metallic Bed Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- The Cherokee Nation, and Its Attorneys, Paul M. Niebell, Earl Boyd Pierce, George E. Norvell, and Dennis W. Bushyhead v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Intertype Corporation v. Clark-Congress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Luther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.