Legal Opinion

Intertype Corporation v. Clark-Congress Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 13, 1957No. 12050_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying recovery of a supersedeas bond premium as an item of taxable costs. This is the fourth time the parties have appeared in this court. See Intertype v. Clark-Congress, 7 Cir., 219 F.2d 90; Intertype v. Clark-Congress, No. 11559, dismissed on motion of appellant, Clark-Congress; Intertype Corp. v. Clark-Congress, 7 Cir., 240 F.2d 375. In the last of these cases, we reversed a judgment in favor of Intertype. Upon remand the clerk of the district court, pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Embry v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Paper-Bag MacHine Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Samsung America, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, Samsung Shipbuilding & Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Harry D. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Company, Limited, Formerly Known as Samsung Shipbuilding and Heavy Industries Company, Limited, a Republic of Korea Corporation, Samsung America, Incorporated, and Samsung Construction Equipment Company, a Division of Samsung America, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Republic Tobacco Company v. North Atlantic Trading Company, Inc., North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc., and National Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Janicek v. HinnenColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. State v. KRASZYK ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API