Legal Opinion

State v. Climaco, Climaco, Seminatore, Lefkowitz & Garofoli Co., L.P.A.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1999No. 98-616PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

We are asked to determine whether the statute of limitations in R.C. 2901.13 barred appellant’s prosecution for falsification. For the following reasons, we find that it did. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals.

The February 1, 1996 indictment alleged that appellant knowingly made false statements in violation of R.C. 2921.13 when it filed its June and October 1993 “Employer of Legislative Agent Updated Registration Statements.” R.C. 2921.13(A)(7) states, “No person shall knowingly make a false statement, or knowingly swear or affirm the truth of a false…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Pendergast v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. IrvineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Ault v. JaskoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. HensleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. Cleveland, 08ca009406 (2-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. SwartzOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BessOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GulleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API