United States v. Irvine
Supreme Court of the United States
Certifícate of division in opinion between the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller
The defendant, Clark Irvine, is charged in the indictment in this case, that on the twenty-fourth day of December, 1870, as the agent and attorney of Mrs. Berkely, he wrongfully withheld from her the amount of her pension, to wit, $525, allowed her under the pension laws, and continuously withheld it until the time of finding the indictment in September, 1875.
The indictment comes within the terms of the act of 1864, which we have considered in United States v. Benecke, supra, p. 447.
But the judges have certified to us, among other questions, whether the act of July 8, 1870, does not repeal…
2Cited by63 opinions
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fiswick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pendergast v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.