Maynard v. Philadelphia Cervical Collar Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Per curiam
Steven Maynard, pro se, seeks review of the June 19, 2000, order by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, adopting the February 3, 2000 and May 26, 2000, proposed findings of fact and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, dismissing Maynard’s patent infringement complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over Philadelphia Cervical Collar Company, Inc. (“Philadelphia Cervical”); Charles Greiner and Company, Inc. (“Greiner Company”); Salvatore Calabrese, Anthony Calabrese (grandchildren and great grandchildren of), the Es-. tate of Anthony Calabrese, Carolyn…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Mink v. AAAA Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nexlearn, LLC v. Allen Interactions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Convergence Technologies (USA), LLC v. Microloops Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Lifestyle Lift Holding, Co., Inc. v. PrendivilleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- McGill Technology Ltd. v. Gourmet Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Litmer v. PDQUSA. ComDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.